2010 term · Roberts Court · 8-0
Cigna Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Janice C. Amara, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
563 U.S. 421 · 131 S. Ct. 1866 · 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3540
The record
- Term
- 2010
- Decided
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Vote split
- 8-0
- Winning party
- Petitioner
- Decision direction
- Conservative
- Chief Justice
- Roberts Court
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Docket
- 09-804
- U.S. Reports
- 563 U.S. 421
- S. Ct. citation
- 131 S. Ct. 1866
- LEXIS citation
- 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3540
How the bench divided
MMMMMMCC?
M 6 majorityC 2 concurring? 1 no vote recorded
| Justice | Vote |
|---|---|
| John G. Roberts | Majority |
| Anthony Kennedy | Majority |
| Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority |
| Stephen Breyer | Majority |
| Samuel Alito | Majority |
| Elena Kagan | Majority |
| Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence |
| Clarence Thomas | Special concurrence |
| Sonia Sotomayor | Unknown |
Read the opinion
Same issue area
More on Economic Activity
Decisions the Court reached on the same question, nearest in time to this one. Economic Activity accounts for 1,819 of the 9,277 decisions in this dataset.
John D. Ashcroft, Petitioner v. Abdullah Al-Kidd
Microsoft Corporation, Petitioner v. I4I Limited Partnership et al.
Talk America, Petitioner v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Michigan
American Electric Power Company, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Connecticut et Al
Reed Elsevier, Inc., et al., v. Irvin Muchnick et al.
Robert Morrison, et al. v. National Australia Bank Ltd. et al.