2009 term · Roberts Court · 8-0
Robert Morrison, et al. v. National Australia Bank Ltd. et al.
561 U.S. 247 · 130 S. Ct. 2869 · 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5257
The record
- Term
- 2009
- Decided
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Vote split
- 8-0
- Winning party
- Respondent
- Decision direction
- Conservative
- Chief Justice
- Roberts Court
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Docket
- 08-1191
- U.S. Reports
- 561 U.S. 247
- S. Ct. citation
- 130 S. Ct. 2869
- LEXIS citation
- 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5257
How the bench divided
MMMMMCCC?
M 5 majorityC 3 concurring? 1 no vote recorded
| Justice | Vote |
|---|---|
| John G. Roberts | Majority |
| Antonin Scalia | Majority |
| Anthony Kennedy | Majority |
| Clarence Thomas | Majority |
| Samuel Alito | Majority |
| Stephen Breyer | Regular concurrence |
| John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence |
| Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Special concurrence |
| Sonia Sotomayor | Unknown |
Read the opinion
Same issue area
More on Economic Activity
Decisions the Court reached on the same question, nearest in time to this one. Economic Activity accounts for 1,819 of the 9,277 decisions in this dataset.
Reed Elsevier, Inc., et al., v. Irvin Muchnick et al.
Cigna Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Janice C. Amara, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
John D. Ashcroft, Petitioner v. Abdullah Al-Kidd
Microsoft Corporation, Petitioner v. I4I Limited Partnership et al.
Talk America, Petitioner v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Michigan
American Electric Power Company, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Connecticut et Al