Skip to main content
Independent · not a government site

2025 term · Roberts Court · vote not recorded

Mullin v. Doe

609 U.S. 324

The record

Term
2025
Decided
Issue area
—
Vote split
—
Winning party
—
Decision direction
—
Chief Justice
Roberts Court
Disposition
—
Docket
25-1083
U.S. Reports
609 U.S. 324
S. Ct. citation
—
LEXIS citation
—
Opinion by
Samuel Alito

Holding

Section 1254a(b)(5)(A) bars judicial review of non-constitutional claims related to Temporary Protected Status (TPS); Miot respondents’ equal protection claim—that Haiti’s TPS designation was terminated because of race—is unlikely to succeed because a race-neutral explanation for the Government’s action exists: the current administration opposes the TPS program as it has been implemented in the past and has terminated every TPS designation that has come up for renewal.

Syllabus summary as published on the Supreme Court’s opinions list.

How the bench divided

No per-justice vote lineup was available for this case.