Skip to main content
Independent · not a government site

2024 term · Supreme Court · vote not recorded

Goldey v. Fields

606 U.S. 942

The record

Term
2024
Decided
Issue area
—
Vote split
—
Winning party
—
Decision direction
—
Chief Justice
—
Disposition
—
Docket
24-809
U.S. Reports
606 U.S. 942
S. Ct. citation
—
LEXIS citation
—
Opinion by
Per curiam

Holding

The Fourth Circuit’s determination that inmate Andrew Fields could proceed with his Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim for damages under Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388 (1971), is reversed, and the case is remanded.

Syllabus summary as published on the Supreme Court’s opinions list.

How the bench divided

No per-justice vote lineup was available for this case.

Read the opinion

Name, docket, decision date, citation, syllabus summary and opinion author are taken from the Court’s slip opinion for the 2024 term. No per-justice vote lineup was available for this case. Verify against the opinion before relying on it as legal authority.