Skip to main content
Independent · not a government site

2024 term · Roberts Court · vote not recorded

FCC v. Consumers’ Research

606 U.S. 656

The record

Term
2024
Decided
Issue area
—
Vote split
—
Winning party
—
Decision direction
—
Chief Justice
Roberts Court
Disposition
—
Docket
24-354
U.S. Reports
606 U.S. 656
S. Ct. citation
—
LEXIS citation
—
Opinion by
Elena Kagan

Holding

The universal-service contribution scheme does not violate the Constitution’s nondelegation doctrine; Congress sufficiently guided and constrained the discretion that it lodged with the Federal Communications Commission to implement that scheme, and the FCC has retained all decision-making authority within that sphere, relying on the Universal Service Administrative Company only for non-binding advice.

Syllabus summary as published on the Supreme Court’s opinions list.

How the bench divided

No per-justice vote lineup was available for this case.