2024 term · Roberts Court · vote not recorded
Cunningham v. Cornell Univ.
604 U.S. 693
The record
- Term
- 2024
- Decided
- Issue area
- —
- Vote split
- —
- Winning party
- —
- Decision direction
- —
- Chief Justice
- Roberts Court
- Disposition
- —
- Docket
- 23-1007
- U.S. Reports
- 604 U.S. 693
- S. Ct. citation
- —
- LEXIS citation
- —
- Opinion by
- Sonia Sotomayor
Holding
To state a prohibited-transactions claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, see 29 U. S. C. §1106(a)(1)(C), a plaintiff need only plausibly allege the elements contained in that provision itself, without addressing potential §1108 exemptions.
How the bench divided
No per-justice vote lineup was available for this case.
Read the opinion
- supremecourt.govSlip opinionThe opinion as released by the Court, in slip form.
- JustiaFull opinion textThe majority, concurring and dissenting opinions as handed down.
- supremecourt.govDocket 23-1007Filings, orders and the procedural history on the Court’s own docket.
- OyezCase pageArgument audio and the vote lineup, when Oyez has published them.