2024 term · Roberts Court · 6-2
Glossip v. Oklahoma
604 U.S. 226
The record
- Term
- 2024
- Decided
- Issue area
- —
- Vote split
- 6-2
- Winning party
- —
- Decision direction
- —
- Chief Justice
- Roberts Court
- Disposition
- —
- Docket
- 22-7466
- U.S. Reports
- 604 U.S. 226
- S. Ct. citation
- —
- LEXIS citation
- —
- Opinion by
- Sonia Sotomayor
Holding
The Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals; the prosecution violated its constitutional obligation to correct false testimony under Napue v. Illinois, 360 U. S. 264.
How the bench divided
MMMMMCDD–
M 5 majorityC 1 concurringD 2 dissenting– 1 not participating
| Justice | Vote |
|---|---|
| Sonia Sotomayor | Majority |
| John G. Roberts | Majority |
| Elena Kagan | Majority |
| Brett Kavanaugh | Majority |
| Ketanji Brown Jackson | Majority |
| Amy Coney Barrett | Regular concurrence |
| Clarence Thomas | Dissent |
| Samuel Alito | Dissent |
| Neil Gorsuch | No participation |
Read the opinion
- supremecourt.govSlip opinionThe opinion as released by the Court, in slip form.
- JustiaFull opinion textThe majority, concurring and dissenting opinions as handed down.
- supremecourt.govDocket 22-7466Filings, orders and the procedural history on the Court’s own docket.
- OyezCase pageArgument audio and the vote lineup, when Oyez has published them.